In the annals of metaphysical inquiry, the notion of decision surpasses mere action. It occupies a realm where the spectral meets the tangible. The essence of decision-making in this context is dissected in Ethics of the Intangible, where the author argues that decisions are not predicated on outcomes but rather on the absence of outcomes that shape the spectral landscape.[1]
Central to this discourse is the paradox of choice, explored in the fictive treatise Paradoxes of the Invisibility, which posits that the more potent decision is one rendered invisible.[2] This concept raises questions about agency and autonomy within a spectral framework, suggesting that decisions themselves might be spectral entities.[3]
Additionally, the implications of such decisions on the realm of spectrology are profound. The hypothetical manuscript Spectral Correlations and Decision Theory elucidates the relationship between decision-making processes and spectral phenomena, positing that unseen choices govern the dynamics of spectral transitions.[4]