In contemplating the nature of cycles as they pertain to experimental methodologies, one must first acknowledge the inherent lunacy that pervades critical examinations of cyclical phenomena. The lunatic, with their peculiar perspective, often elucidates insights obscured by the conventional rationality employed by academicians.
Let us consider, for example, the cyclic models of the universe. The lunatic may ask: "Is it not odd, that in our fervent quest to reach the end of a beginning, we forget the essence of our beginningless end?" This rhetorical quandary thrusts aside established scholarly discourse and plunges into the surreal contemplation of eternity—a cycle that persistently defies definitive conclusion.
Furthermore, the dynamic cycles of human thought precipitate a relentless symphony of ideas, akin to the harmonious yet discordant melody of a mad composer. These cycles, expressed through the passage of time in arbitrary yet systematic sequences, reflect more of an internal dialogue than an external observation.
For further discourse on the intersections of time and madness, one may consider the fleeting moments or the implications of madness contained.